I know we said we were done linking to stories on the Colts’ move to Baltimore, but Phil Richards of the Indianapolis Star weighed in with a piece this morning. It’s worth the read. Richards’ stories always are.

 

Waking up: 2009 NFL Draft

Good morning . . .

The 2009 NFL Draft is less than four weeks away, and to kick off the final month, Indy Football Report will ratchet up its pre-draft coverage.

Will the Colts go defensive tackle in the first round? Will it be a wide receiver to replace Marvin Harrison?

Or will Colts President Bill Polian do what he often has done in 11 previous drafts — go against conventional wisdom in the first round? The reality is no one will know until the afternoon of April 25, when the Colts are on the clock at No. 27, which is not to say we won’t join the discussion.

I’ve got some interesting items to discuss this week on Polian’s draft history, and we’ll be analyzing many of the mock drafts and trying to figure out just who might be available for the Colts on draft day.

We’ll get started with my mock draft around 11 today. Look forward to a month of discussion.

Tagged with:
 

A bit more on the Indianapolis Colts’ 1984 move

UPDATE: Added a clip from a Baltimore television station. Has some archived footage of the event from 1984.

Promise these posts on the Indianapolis Colts’ 1984 move from Baltimore won’t go on forever.

But . . .

For the sake of perspective, I wanted to pass along links to a few stories in the Baltimore Sun Sunday. The paper did a good job of providing something of a fresh perspective, detailing some of the conflicting history of the move, as well as how the move really was a good move for both cities.

Also a good piece from Ken Murray, the Colts’ beat writer for the Baltimore Sun when the team moved. As I read through it a second time, it strikes me that it’s a really good piece, and the sort of writing, reporting and perspective we’re going to lose fast if newspapers continue their decline, but I digress. It’s the old beat guy in me, but I love reading how the person covering the events not only covered it, but how he felt about it.

Lastly, here’s a link from Stampede Blue on the move, and one from 18to88, but as we perhaps close this 25th anniversary weekend, it does feel from reading the reports in Baltimore that wounds have closed just a bit. Maybe it’s time. Maybe it’s just that fewer people are around from 25 years ago.

Don’t want to speak for that city, just a vibe I got reading the reports.

Tagged with:
 

A Popular Guy

Sunday morning update . . .

* Peyton Manning received a Kid’s Choice Award on Saturday for Most Popular Male Athlete.

* Story on Colts Head Coach Jim Caldwell in the Charlotte Observer.

Tagged with:
 

Still wanting in . . .

Jeff George spoke with Yahoo.com’s Michael Silver late last week about a possible comeback at age 41.

And no, I’m not going to follow that up with something snide or snarky. You can’t fault a guy for not wanting to give up on a dream and believing in himself. I can’t imagine it working out, but I liked Silver’s story because he didn’t take the easy angle and make fun of George — the No. 1 overall selection in the 1991 NFL Draft by the Colts — or emphasize all the negatives. He tried to paint what he thought was an accurate picture.

Never knew Jeff. Only covered a few games in which he played. Just thought I’d pass the link along.

Tagged with:
 

You Just Wonder . . .

I read with interest the story in the Indianapolis Star Friday about lawmakers believing the Colts are responsible in part for solving the “financial woes afflicting the Capital Improvement Board.”

An excerpt from the Star’s story:

Few specifics were available, but legislative leaders said many options were being discussed — including requiring the Indianapolis Colts to pony up money . . .

The story also said . . .

A contribution from the Colts was at the top of the list for many lawmakers.

And . . .

House Speaker B. Patrick Bauer, D-South Bend, said legislators wonder “why there is no contribution from the Colts to equal what the Pacers contribute.”

Isn’t the answer in the next line of the story?

The Colts negotiated what many now regard as a sweetheart deal for Lucas Oil Stadium, pocketing an estimated $41 million annually in new revenue above the $150 million a year the club had made at its old stadium, the RCA Dome.

It’s the negotiated part that is key — as in, the Colts and City agreed to this situation.

The story went on to say that lawmakers had met with Colts attorneys, and quoted one lawmakers saying . . .

“Everybody wants to solve the problem. Nobody is very happy about giving up any revenues or finding revenues on their own part. It’s going to be a shared pain . . .

When I was with the Colts, they obviously didn’t call me into meetings on this level, and I haven’t discussed this with anyone with the team, but when I worked in Jacksonville, I wrote many stories on the importance of stadium revenue to teams. It’s an importance that can’t be underestimated, and when the Colts negotiated with the city to build Lucas Oil Stadium, there was a lot of truth to the general gist of their stance, which was that it was going to very difficult — perhaps impossible — for the team to remain competitive in the antiquated RCA Dome.

There are obviously tons of details of this story that aren’t being reported, but what strikes me about the story is the assumption on the part of lawmakers that the Colts are going to “pony up” $3.5 million a year. Just like that? And just because lawmakers want them to?

The story called the Colts’ agreement with the city a “sweetheart deal,” which perhaps it was. But the deal is signed, and I just don’t know if getting them to change that deal is the given that some lawmakers may believe.

 

Twenty-five years later . . .

The Colts’ move 25 years ago to Indianapolis wasn’t a huge topic among national media guys this week, but an astute Clark Judge of CBS Sports covered it Friday.

Clark’s one of the better NFL writers around, a guy with a calm approach and insightful perspective.

He’s also a guy willing to take a moment and think for himself.

Which is what he did in this piece Friday on Colts Owner and Chief Executive Officer Jim Irsay’s thoughts regarding the events of March of 1984. It was Irsay’s father, Robert, who made the decision to move the Colts from Baltimore, and Irsay recounted the situation — and some pretty touching family stuff — in good detail.

Irsay in the piece said his father didn’t want to leave Baltimore, and you can catch the details in Clark’s well-written story. Irsay also discussed in depth Robert Irsay’s alcoholism, and reading the story, you get an appreciation for how much he admired his father while also understanding clearly his shortcomings.

As is usually the case when Irsay is interviewed, there was a lot interesting in the story, and it’s worth the read. What struck me most about the story — and I credit Clark for this, having pretty deep Baltimore roots – is he gives Irsay the credit he deserves for being one of the NFL’s best owners.

Before 2006, I used to tell people one of the best things that would happen if the Colts made the Super Bowl was it would give the national media a forum to first grasp then relay to the public how underappreciated Irsay is as an owner. For years before the Super Bowl, he was closely associated with his father, and too often, fans nationally didn’t appreciate or realize the difference in the two. Early in the decade, you’d read an occasional piece that talked of the Colts and how their owners moved them from Baltimore when in fact, Robert had died years earlier.

That has changed. Maybe it was the Super Bowl. Or maybe it’s time, but people don’t seem to associate the two as closely anymore. But it struck me during the Super Bowl run and afterward that despite the success, Irsay doesn’t get quite the credit he deserves. Almost certainly it’s because by comparison he’s a fairly l0w-profile owner who generally stays out of the way.

So, if he’s so low-key, why does he deserve credit? Because although Irsay spent years as the Colts’ general manager upon their arrival in Indianapolis, he was smart enough upon assuming ownership to not get heavily involved. He hired one of the game’s best executives, Bill Polian, and gave him control. He hired Jim Mora, and when Mora was fired in January of 2002, Tony Dungy came available days later.

It’s easy to forget now that Dungy didn’t walk from his Tampa offices, and fly immediately to Indianapolis to finish what eventually became almost a fairy-tale story. He also interviewed with Carolina, and seriously considered not coaching. What Irsay did was completely in character.

He didn’t try to be coy. He didn’t try to feel Dungy out. He called Dungy and immediately ceded bargaining power, saying he was the clear first choice for the job and essentially saying whatever Dungy wanted was his.

It wasn’t orthodox, but Irsay’s not orthodox. But he does know what he wants and what he wants mostly is for the Colts to win, and in 2002 he wanted Dungy no matter what it took.

A no-brainer? Sure, now. And Polian looks like a no-brainer now, too, but remember: no decision is a no-brainer before it happens. There were three decisions that set the tone for the Colts’ recent decade of success. Irsay was the primary decision-maker behind two — Polian and Dungy — and months after Polian’s hiring, Polian chose the third, which of course if quarterback Peyton Manning.

Had any of those decisions turned out wrong, doubtless Irsay would be blamed, so you’ve got to give him the credit when they’re right. It’s not something that gets discussed a lot, and that’s why I give Clark Judge a lot of credit, because even with his Baltimore roots, he subjectively read this one just right.

Tagged with:
 

Auburn DE Tez Doolittle to visit Colts

With the 2009 NFL Draft less than month away, Indy Football Report will begin turning its attention in that direction bigtime next week.

Until then, here’s a link to a story on Coltpower.com about the Colts’ scheduling an on-campus workout with Auburn defensive tackle Tez Doolittle on April 13.

A special thanks to the people at Coltpower for passing it on.

Other college players reported to have scheduled workouts with the Colts:

North Dakota State linebacker Ramon Humbar, Monday March, 30th.

* South Dakota wide receiver JaRon Harris.

* Morgan State defensive tackle Lonnie Harvey.

* Southern California quarterback Mark Sanchez.

* Western Illinois outside linebacker Jason Williams.

Tagged with:
 

Here’s a link to the story on the Indianapolis Colts’ wide receivers in the ongoing position-by-position series on Colts.com . . .

Jim Caldwell, entering his first season as the Colts’ head coach, praised three-time Pro Bowl wide receiver Reggie Wayne for his work ethic and for getting better every season, which is to be expected. He also spoke highly of third-year wide receiver Anthony Gonzalez:

Anthony Gonzalez has gotten better not just every year, but he gets better everyday. His first year, he was effective. His second season, he was more effective.”

Caldwell also talked about the Colts’ reserve receivers. Likes Pierre Garcon and Roy Hall, and also went out of his way to mention practice-squad guys Sam Giguerre and Taj Smith.

One of the most interesting stories this season — at receiver or any position — will be the development of Gonzalez. He has developed in two seasons, and I keep thinking of the end of the 2007 seasons, when he showed real signs of developing. He did last year, too, but watching him, I kept thinking he could have had a more significant role in the offense if not for the Colts continuing to start Marvin Harrison on the outside.

I see Gonzalez having a big year next season. Don’t know how big, but for people wondering if he’ll fulfill the potential of a first-round selection rememebr Reggie Wayne didn’t have his first 1,000-yard season until 2004, his fourth professional season.

Tagged with:
 

Colts Wide Receivers in Round 1: An Efficiency Thing

The Indianapolis Colts have been mindblowingly efficient when it comes to selecting wide receivers.

That’s particularly true in the first round.

I’ve always sort of had that feeling, but a terrific piece by ESPN AFC South guru Paul Kuharsky brought the Colts’ success — and the struggles of their competitors — in using prime draft selections at wide receivers into full detail.

Here’s a quote from the piece from former Kansas City Chiefs and New York Jets Head Coach Herman Edwards:

“If you look at Indy, they’ve got a system with a quarterback where all they have to do it fit the pieces they want, like the kid Gonzalez they drafted from Ohio State. You look at him now, they used him a lot in the slot, so they kind of brought him along. I think now with Marvin being gone Gonzalez will probably replace Marvin outside. When they moved him to the slot, they really took away Dallas Clark, because Clark is really their slot guy in three wideouts, they put him in the slot a lot. Now they’ve got a speed guy in Gonzalez, they can move him back outside and now what they’ll probably do is look for another guy. They are always a year or two ahead of what they want to do.

A quick aside about that last line by Edwards:  They are always a year or two ahead of what they want to do.

I don’t know that I’ve seen anyone articulate the reason for the Colts’ success in the last 10 years better or more succintly. That’s exactly why the Colts have been successful — because Colts President Bill Polian typically has been a year ahead of what the Colts have wanted to do. Now that the Colts need a receiver to replace Marvin Harrison, Gonzalez is in his third season and gives the Colts a pair of legitimate receivers. They have done this at linebacker for years with success.

It’s also, of course, what makes fans nervous. Being ahead of what you need to do means beginning seasons with unknown players. Fans naturally would rather have a familiar name — perhaps a big-time free agent — at linebacker than second-year veteran Philip Wheeler. Familiarity is comfortable. It eases the mind. But it doesn’t mean a veteran’s a better player than a young guy and in the NFL, the opposite is often true.

But I digress:

In the ESPN piece, Kuharsky does a great job getting into the meat of the draft philsophy of the Colts, Jaguars and Titans when it comes to wide receivers. The gist is that the Colts have come up but with players such as Marvin Harrison, Reggie Wayne, Anthony Gonzalez and even Dallas Clark in the round, and that they have clearly made a commitment to surround quarterback Peyton Manning with weapons. Jacksonville has tried to find receivers in Round 1 to much less success and Tennessee has opted for players at the position in the later rounds.

I think the piece once again shows a huge reason the Colts have been successful the last 10 years. Receiver is a premium positon in how the team is built, and while Polian’s draft record is terrific no matter the position, his ability to make the right selection in early rounds on offense is nearly unassailable. He didn’t draft Harrison, but he selected Wayne when many believed it was the wrong choice and selected Clark in a year when many were clamoring for defense (has there ever been any other kind?).

The Colts have selected just seven wide receivers since 1997 — that’s 28th in the NFL — but has any team gotten more from the position? There’s a chance the Colts could take a receiver at No. 27 this season, of course, and the closer the draft gets, that sees the direction there heading.

I’d feel pretty good if they take a wide receiver, they’ll make the right choice.

Tagged with:
 
Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes